In my previous post, I have shown that loading Adaptive Plans in the SQL Plan Baseline leads to using the original plan. Well, actually, this is true when you capture them via the OPTIMIZER_CAPTURE_SQL_PLAN_BASELINES parameter.

Thanks to a tweet by Neil Chandler, I’ve realized that it was a good idea to show also the case when the plan is loaded manually.

When the adaptive plan switches to the alternative plan, the plan_hash_value also changes, and can be loaded manually in the baseline with DBMS_SPM.

Let’s reset everything and retry quickly to:

• Capture the plan automatically (this will lead to the original plan)
• Load the plan manually (I will specify to load the alternative plan, if resolved)
• Drop the plan captured automatically
• Use the newly accepted baseline

To recap:

• The capture process will always load the original plan
• It is possible to decide to load manually the original one or the alternative one (if resolved)
• Using automatic capture is a bad idea

HTH

—

Ludo

Disclaimer: after writing this post (but before publishing it) I have seen that other people already blogged about it, so I am ashamed of publishing it anyway… but that’s blogger’s life 🙂

Wednesday I have got a nice question after my presentation about Adaptive Features at the DOAG16 conference:

What happens when you load an adaptive plan in a SQL Plan Baseline?
Does it load only the final plan or does it load the whole plan including the inactive operations? Will the plan be evaluated again using the inflection point?

I have decided to do some tests in order to give the best possible answer. I did not spend the time to rethink about producing an adaptive plan. Tim Hall already did an excellent test case to create and alter an adaptive plan in his blog, so I have reused massively most of its code. Thanks Tim :-).

I will not post all the code (please find it in Tim’s post), I will go straight to the plans.

First: I have an adaptive plan that resolves to NESTED LOOPS:

Second: I load the plan (lazy way: using baseline capture at session level)

Third: re-run the statement and check the plan

It does not look adaptive, but I can also check from the function DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_SQL_PLAN_BASELINE:

Again, despite in the Note section it says it is adaptive, it does not look like an adaptive plan.

Can I trust this information? Of course I did not and tried to check the plan with and without baseline after changing the rows to force a plan switch to HJ (again taking Tim’s example):

After changing the rows:

• when I do not use the baseline, the plan resolves to HASH JOIN
• when I use it, the baseline forces to NESTED LOOPS.

So the plan in the baseline is not adaptive and it forces to what has been loaded. Is it the final plan or the original one? I have to capture it again to see if a new baseline appears:

A new baseline does not appear, so it looks that the original plan is considered by the capture process and not the resolved one! To be 100% sure, let’s try to drop the existing one and redo the test: